 |
Introduction
This program will provide the practicing healthcare professional with best practices and approaches to the screening, prevention, and treatment of cancer in disparate populations and will equip the participants with the tools necessary to objectively evaluate and optimize lung cancer care. Determining which approach is most appropriate for a given patient requires understanding of the appropriate role of the various biologic and genetic markers, an evaluation of the patient-specific characteristics, physician expertise in managing drug therapy, and available health system resources. On July 18, 2009, a panel of experts gathered for a conversation to put the latest research into perspective and to share their approach to achieving optimal outcomes for their patients.
Faculty
Julie R. Brahmer, MD, bio | Alberto A. Chiappori, MD, bio | Jonathan Dowell, MD, bio | Tarek M. Mekhail, MD, MSc, FRCSI, FRCSEd, bio
Editor
Christopher G. Azzoli, MD, bio
Media: Monograph
Estimated time to complete activity: 1.5 hours. Release date: September 21, 2009 | Expiration date: September 20, 2010
Statement of Need
Cancer afflicts all people, regardless of age, ethnicity, or gender. The incidence, mortality, and survival rates for many of the leading cancers are disproportionately higher for certain special populations. With the growing body of work in the field of race and ethnicity as it applies to cancer and its treatment, there is a need to disseminate to healthcare professionals the available data as well as ongoing healthcare initiatives relating to disparities among racial and ethnic groups. In addition, with the ever-increasing aging population, cancer care in the older patient has become an increasingly important healthcare system priority. Current estimates indicate that nearly 70% of all cancer deaths occur in persons aged 65 years or older. In addition, great strides have been made in developing treatments that exploit knowledge about the etiology and growth of lung cancer. As many important clinical trials are reaching maturity, an explosion of information is becoming available on the relevance of the biologic and/or genomic characteristics of a specific patient’s disease to tailor therapy for maximum effectiveness. To date, most information has been derived from retrospective analysis of tissue specimens and outcome data from prior clinical trials. Prospective trials to validate the utility of these markers are being initiated, but the provocative nature of some of the retrospective analyses is leading some clinicians to change their treatment paradigm. During the past decade, one of the most widely studied approaches to lung cancer has been that of novel treatment approaches. After a number of single-agent successes in the realm of advanced disease, these novel approaches are moving into combination regimens and earlier stage settings where the potential for enhanced cure rates is being explored.
This interactive program will provide the practicing healthcare professional with best practices and approaches to the screening, prevention, and treatment of cancer in disparate populations and will equip the participants with the tools necessary to objectively evaluate and optimize cancer care in the older patient. Our analysis of the science and evidence-based treatment approaches for the management of lung cancer, specifically the identification of appropriate treatment for the individual patient, concludes a need to educate oncology healthcare professionals exists. Determining which approach is most appropriate for a given patient requires understanding of the appropriate role of the various biologic and genetic markers, an evaluation of the patient-specific characteristics, physician expertise in managing drug therapy, and available health system resources. Healthcare professionals caring for patients with advanced lung cancer need to understand the basis for therapies most commonly encountered as well as the preclinical and clinical data supporting the development and integration of these therapies into clinical practice. Furthermore, the management of side effects related to the use of these novel therapeutics will be important for their clinical usage.
Target Audience
The target audience for the interactive web-based monograph includes medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists and other healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of lung cancer.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this educational program, participants should be better able to:
- Describe factors that may contribute to lung cancer incidence and mortality disparities within a racial or ethnic group compared to the overall population
- Identify profiles of selected best practices, such as diagnostic procedures and treatment, within disparate populations
- Cite age-appropriate interventions for managing elderly patients with lung cancer
- Analyze the various clinical and histological factors that help determine eligibility of a patient for a particular type of therapy
- Explain the current state of biomarkers, both prognostic and predictive factors, influencing NSCLC management
- Interpret and report studies on adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for stage I – stage III NSCLC, including a comparison of the conflicting results in stage I disease
- Describe current therapies for the treatment of NSCLC and their applicability in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
- Describe studies that utilize agents in the adjuvant setting
- Compare the first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC and the role of newer agents, maintenance therapy, consolidation therapy, and clinical trials in this population
- Interpret clinical trial results from second-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
ACCREDITATION INFORMATION
PHYSICIAN CONTINUING EDUCATION
ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
Educational Concepts Group, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT
Educational Concepts Group, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
PHARMACIST CONTINUING EDUCATION |
 |
| Educational Concepts Group, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education. |
|
Type of Activity: Knowledge-based
Educational Concepts Group, LLC designates this continuing education activity for 1.5 contact hours (0.15 CEUs) (UPN 199-000-09-040-H01-P).
|
METHOD OF PARTICIPATION
There are no fees for participating and receiving CME/CE credit for this activity.
During the period September 21, 2009 through September 20, 2010, participants must 1) read the learning objectives and faculty disclosures; 2) study the educational activity; 3) complete the post-test and activity evaluation form.
CME/CE CREDIT
Physicians and pharmacists who complete the post-test with a score of 70% or better may view and print their credit letter or statement of credit via the website, www.educationalconcepts.net.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMMERCIAL SUPPORT
This activity is supported by an educational grant from from Lilly USA, LLC.
DISCLOSURE OF OFF-LABEL USE
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. Educational Concepts Group, LLC (ECG) does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. The opinions expressed in the educational activity do not necessarily represent the views of ECG. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
None of the contents may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission from the publisher. This activity may be accessed at www.educationalconcepts.net.
CME/CE INQUIRIES
For further information, please contact
Educational Concepts Group, LLC
1300 Parkwood Circle SE
Suite 325
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Phone: 1.770.933.1681
Fax: 1.770.933.1692
www.educationalconcepts.net |
FACULTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
All faculty participating in continuing education activities sponsored by ECG are expected to disclose to the audience any real or apparent commercial financial affiliations related to the content of their presentations/materials.
THE FOLLOWING FACULTY MEMBERS HAVE DECLARED RELEVANT FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS
Christopher G. Azzoli, MD
Grants/Research Support
Allos Therapeutics, Inc., Genentech BioOncology, sanofi-aventis Group
Julie R. Brahmer, MD
Grants/Research Support
Merck & Co., Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Consultant Fees
Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech BioOncology
Alberto A. Chiappori, MD
Speakers’ Bureau
Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech BioOncology
Jonathan Dowell, MD
Grants/Research Support
Genentech BioOncology
Tarek M. Mekhail, MD, MSc, FRCSI, FRCSEd
Consultant Fees
Genentech BioOncology, sanofi-aventis Group
Honorarium, Speakers’ Bureau
Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech BioOncology, sanofi-aventis Group
ECG HAS DECLARED THE FOLLOWING FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS
ECG receives educational grants from pharmaceutical industry and other commercial sources. Planners, managers, and other staff members at ECG have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
DISCLAIMER
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications on dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product or consult the Physicians’ Desk Reference for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
|
|
|